Process
Every engagement follows the same six steps: understand the system, scope the review, test against real attack paths, rank what we find, help you fix it, and hand over evidence you can show to your own customers and auditors. Depth and timeline flex with your release schedule. The sequence does not.
The same six steps every time, and the owner of each one is always clear. Depth and timeline flex with your release schedule; the sequence does not.
We start with a conversation about your agents, not a questionnaire. We map what they do, which tools and data they can reach, what runs unattended, and what a bad day would look like. Bring an architecture sketch, a workflow, or the one threat that already worries you. Within two business days you get a written read on whether a review is worth your time and a rough shape of the scope.
Scope is agreed in writing before any testing begins. We name the agents, environments, tools, and credentials in play, what is off limits, and what counts as done.
We test the way an attacker would, inside the scope you approved, and we report nothing on suspicion. Every finding arrives reproduced, with the transcript, trace, or code path that shows it and the conditions under which it works.
We walk through the findings with the people who own the code and the risk. Each item is ranked by exploitability and business impact rather than by scanner severity, then grouped into fix now, fix next, and accepted risk with the reason recorded. You leave the session knowing the order of work and the two or three changes that matter most.
Where it helps, we stay in the work instead of handing over a list: concrete fix guidance, design review of the guardrails, review of your patches, and a re-test of everything we reported. Support scales to what your team needs, from a written recommendation to pairing with your engineers on the change itself.
At close you receive a written package: what was tested and what was not, every finding with its evidence and current status, residual risk, and the fixes we verified. We finish with a readout for the engineers and for whoever has to answer questions about the system later, so the security story is documented and defensible after we leave.
Tell us what your agents do, what they can reach, and what worries you. We will tell you where we would look first and whether a review makes sense.